Benchmark shows context engine reduces AI coding agent costs by 3x on SWE-bench

A developer benchmarked four AI coding agents on SWE-bench Verified using the same Claude Opus 4.5 model, with context management as the only variable. The results show significant cost differences for similar performance levels.
Benchmark setup
The test used a 100-task stratified subset of SWE-bench Verified with all 12 repositories represented proportionally. All agents ran Claude Opus 4.5 with the same $3/task budget and 250-turn limit. The only difference was the context layer in front of the model.
Results
- Context engine + Claude Code: 73.0% Pass@1, $0.67/task
- Live-SWE-Agent: 72.0% Pass@1, $0.86/task
- OpenHands: 70.0% Pass@1, $1.77/task
- Sonar Foundation: 70.0% Pass@1, $1.98/task
The most expensive setup costs 3x more per task for a lower resolution rate. Eight tasks were solved only by the setup with the context layer - bugs that the model couldn't fix without seeing the right code.
Limitations
On matplotlib (rendering-heavy, visual output code), the context engine scored 43% while Sonar Foundation hit 86%. Graph-based context is less effective when relevant code doesn't follow dependency chains.
How the context layer works
Instead of letting Claude read entire files, it pre-indexes the codebase into a dependency graph using tree-sitter + SQLite (30 languages supported) and returns a ranked context capsule: full source for functions that matter, skeletonized signatures for everything connected to them. The agent starts every task already knowing what's relevant.
It includes session memory that persists across sessions via MCP. When code changes, previous observations get flagged as stale automatically, so the agent doesn't re-explore the same things.
The system is 100% local with no cloud, no account, and no code leaving your machine. It works with Claude Code and 11 other agents via MCP.
Open source availability
The benchmark harness, all evaluation logs, per-instance results, and comparison scripts are available on GitHub at github.com/Vexp-ai/vexp-swe-bench. The tool itself is available at vexp.dev with a free tier, VS Code extension, or CLI. Full benchmark results with charts are at vexp.dev/benchmark.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

WebClaw: Open-Source MCP Server for Web Extraction with Claude
WebClaw is an open-source MCP server built with Claude Code that provides web extraction tools for Claude Desktop and Claude Code, solving Claude's built-in web_fetch limitations with TLS fingerprinting and content optimization.

How I built a 3D scroll website in 2 hours using Claude Code and Veo
A developer built a 3D scroll website in 2 hours using Claude Code, Veo video generation, and a custom 'video to website' skill. Full code and live demo shared.

SeeFlow: Architecture Diagrams That Are Wired to Your Live App
SeeFlow generates a flow canvas from your codebase and wires each node to your actual running app, with plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, and an MCP server.
Daily Search Console Checks with OpenClaw: Server-Side Analysis, So the Agent Never Does the Maths
A developer built six MIT-licensed OpenClaw skills that run Search Console analysis server-side, so the agent explains finished results instead of calculating trends from truncated data.