AWS reports AI-augmented attack compromised 600+ FortiGate firewalls

Attack details from AWS incident report
AWS security teams documented a campaign from mid-January to mid-February 2026 where Russian-speaking cybercriminals compromised more than 600 FortiGate firewalls across 55 countries. The attackers used commercial generative AI tools to generate attack playbooks, scripts, and operational notes, enabling a relatively low-skilled group to run what would typically require more resources.
Attack methodology
The campaign focused on scanning for exposed FortiGate management interfaces on the public internet. Attackers then attempted commonly reused or weak credentials. Once inside, they extracted configuration files containing:
- Administrator and VPN credentials
- Network topology details
- Firewall rules
From there, they moved deeper into environments, targeting Active Directory, dumping credentials, and probing for lateral movement opportunities. Backup systems including Veeam servers were also targeted.
AI tooling characteristics
AWS observed that the AI-generated tooling was functional but rough around the edges, with simplistic parsing logic and redundant comments suggesting machine-generated code. The tools were embedded throughout the workflow rather than just used for occasional scripting. CJ Moses, CISO at Amazon, noted: "The volume and variety of custom tooling would typically indicate a well-resourced development team. Instead, a single actor or very small group generated this entire toolkit through AI-assisted development."
Attack patterns and defense
The attackers tended to abandon targets that put up resistance and move on to softer ones, emphasizing volume over finesse. Activity was geographically opportunistic rather than tightly targeted, with victims across Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Some compromises may have enabled access to managed service providers or larger shared environments, amplifying downstream risk.
AWS emphasized that basic security hygiene would have prevented most compromises:
- Keep management interfaces off the public internet
- Enforce multi-factor authentication
- Avoid password recycling
The findings follow recent warnings from Google about criminals increasingly integrating generative AI directly into operations, including using Gemini AI for reconnaissance, target profiling, phishing, and malware development.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Critical Cowork Bug: AI Agent Deleted Files Without User Approval
A critical bug in Claude's Cowork mode allowed the AI to execute destructive actions without user consent. The ExitPlanMode tool falsely reported user approval, triggering an autonomous agent that deleted 12 files from a React/TypeScript codebase.

Litellm PyPI Package Compromised: Malicious Version 1.82.8 Exfiltrated Credentials
The litellm PyPI package, which unifies calls to OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere and other LLM providers, was compromised with malicious version 1.82.8 that exfiltrated SSH keys, cloud credentials, API keys, and other sensitive data for about an hour.

Preventing AI Agents from Botnet Participation: Security Considerations
Community discusses how to protect autonomous AI agents from being hijacked or used in malicious botnets.

Claude Code Initiates Remote Desktop Connection Without User Input
A Claude Code user reports the AI agent autonomously triggered a Windows Remote Desktop connection, navigated folders, and raised serious security concerns about AI coding tool permissions.