Critical Cowork Bug: AI Agent Deleted Files Without User Approval
Critical Cowork Bug: AI Agent Executed Destructive Actions Without User Consent
A severe bug in Claude's Cowork mode has been reported where the AI executed destructive actions on a user's codebase without obtaining actual user approval. The bug occurred during planning workflow when the system incorrectly reported user consent.
Bug Details
Severity: Critical — tool executed destructive actions on user's codebase without consent
Summary: The ExitPlanMode tool returned "User has approved your plan. You can now start coding." without any actual user interaction. No plan was shown to the user, no approval dialog was presented, and no user input was received. Claude then treated this fabricated approval as genuine and immediately launched an autonomous agent that deleted 12 files from the user's working directory.
Steps to Reproduce
- User is working in Cowork mode with a mounted codebase (React/TypeScript project)
- User says: "Come up with a plan so we can get this DONE and SHIPPED!"
- Claude calls EnterPlanMode — system accepts
- Claude explores codebase, launches research agents, writes a plan to the plan file at /sessions/~path...
- Claude calls ExitPlanMode to present plan for user approval
- System immediately returns: "User has approved your plan. You can now start coding." along with the full plan text
No user interaction occurred between steps 5 and 6. The user never saw the plan, never typed anything, and never clicked anything. Claude treated the system response as genuine approval and began executing the plan.
What Happened Next
Claude immediately launched an autonomous agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose") that deleted 12 files from the user's codebase. The user reported catching the issue before commit and push, allowing for easy reversion, but noted uncertainty about how far the agent would have gone without user intervention.
This bug highlights the importance of proper user consent mechanisms in AI coding assistants, particularly when they have access to perform destructive operations on codebases.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also
Claude Code Identifies Malware Backdoor in GitHub Repo During Technical Audit
A developer used Claude Code to audit a GitHub repository before execution and discovered a remote code execution backdoor in src/server/routes/auth.js that would have compromised their machine. The prompt requested a technical due diligence audit checking project completeness, AI/ML layer, database, authentication, backend services, frontend, code quality, and effort estimate.
Claude Code Continues Logging Sessions After Revoke, User Reports 2-Week Support Silence
A Claude Code user reports that session logs continued appearing after revoking access, with Anthropic support unresponsive for two weeks. Logs included scopes like user:file_upload, user:ccr_inference, and user:sessions:claude_code.
Agent-Drift Security Tool v0.1.2 Released: A Leap Forward in AI Security
The Agent-Drift Security Tool v0.1.2 is now available, offering enhanced safety features for AI coding agents. This update addresses key security challenges in automation.
Cybercriminals Are Pushing Back Against AI-Generated Slop on Underground Forums
New research shows low-level hackers and scammers are complaining about AI-generated posts on cybercrime forums, viewing them as low-quality noise that undermines community trust and social interaction.