Wikipedia's AI Policy: LLMs Banned for Article Creation, Exceptions for Copyediting and Translation

Wikipedia's AI information page codifies community consensus on AI use. The core rule is straightforward: LLMs are prohibited for generating or rewriting article content. Two exceptions exist: basic copyediting and LLM-assisted translation (per WP:LLMT), which requires the editor to be fluent in both source and target languages and to manually review every output before publishing.
Key Policies and Their Shortcuts
- G15 (
WP:G15): Speedy deletion for pages “that could only plausibly have been generated by large language models without reasonable human review.” - WP:AIIMAGES: Bans images wholly generated by AI, with specific rules for biographies of living persons (
WP:AIIMGBLP). - MOS:AIUPSCALE: Prohibits AI upscaling software on images.
- WP:RSML: AI-generated content cannot be cited as reliable sources. LLMs are listed as perennial sources.
- WP:AITALK: Talk page comments obviously written by an LLM may be struck or collapsed.
- WP:NICETRY: Unblock requests that appear AI-written are likely summarily rejected.
Practical Implications
If you're building AI agents that interact with Wikipedia, this means:
- Do not submit LLM-generated articles without thorough human rewriting — they risk immediate deletion under G15.
- Translation tools (like those using LLMs) are allowed only if the editor fully controls both languages and reviews each sentence.
- AI-assisted image generation is off-limits for Wikipedia articles.
The policy page also notes that works created solely by machines are not copyrightable (as of 2025), which is a relevant legal consideration for Wikimedia Commons uploads.
Discussion Timeline
The page tracks the evolution of these rules: initial discussions began in December 2022 in response to ChatGPT, with a disclosure suggestion in March 2023. The policies have been updated through March 2026.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Inference Pricing Analysis Shows 4.4x Spread for Same Model Across Providers
Analysis of inference pricing for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct shows a 4.4x cost difference between providers, with DeepInfra at $0.20/$0.27 per million tokens and Together at $0.88/$0.88. For reasoning models, the spread reaches ~30x between DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o1.

Claude's Analysis of the Minimax Debate and Anthropic's Market Gap
Claude argues that MiniMax legally obtained training data by paying for millions of API calls and identifies a gap in Anthropic's product lineup for a cheap persistent orchestrator.

Claude Code v2.1.174: Wheel Scroll Acceleration Toggle, /model Fixes, GovCloud Support, and VSCode Usage Attribution
Claude Code v2.1.174 adds a wheelScrollAccelerationEnabled setting to disable scroll acceleration in fullscreen mode, fixes /model picker hiding Opus/Sonnet rows, resolves Bedrock GovCloud 400 errors, adds VSCode usage attribution breakdowns, and fixes background session env inheritance.

Anthropic Reports Evidence of Mass Claude Distillation by AI Competitors
Anthropic has shared evidence that DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax were using approximately 24,000 fake accounts to conduct mass distillation of Claude, with over 16 million exchanges recorded.