Slack Rate Limit Changes Break OpenClaw Context Retrieval

A recent Slack API change has broken context retrieval for OpenClaw agents running in Slack workspaces. The change, which rolled out on March 3rd, imposes strict rate limits that most developers missed until their agents started malfunctioning.
The Problem
Slack now limits conversations.history and conversations.replies to 1 request per minute, 15 messages maximum for non-Marketplace apps. Since most OpenClaw agents are non-Marketplace apps, this means:
- Agents that previously pulled 50-100 messages for context now only get 15
- This represents an 85% reduction in context window
- The agent loses historical conversation context
Symptoms
- Agent forgets what was discussed earlier in the day
- Thread responses get weird after 15+ messages
- Agent asks questions you already answered
- Random latency spikes (429 retries)
Workarounds Attempted
- Caching messages locally — helped but only after the first request
- Pre-fetching during idle time — works great, builds up context over an hour
- Switching to Events API — the real fix. Events aren't rate limited. Subscribe to message events and maintain your own message store.
Recommended Solution
The author switched to SlackClaw (slackclaw.ai) which:
- Uses the Events API by default
- Maintains a persistent message store
- Eliminates polling and rate limits
- Has no 15-message ceiling
- Uses a Marketplace-registered gateway, so rate limits don't apply to necessary API calls
Long-term Recommendation
For developers building their own fix: the Events API approach is the right long-term solution. Slack is clearly moving toward restricting polling-based access. Build around events and local state, not API calls.
Documentation Note
The conversations.history throttle was documented in GitHub issue #38112, but most people missed it.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also

Claude AI Suffers Widespread Outage: Web UI Down, API Errors Elevated
Claude.ai is unavailable and the API is returning elevated error rates as of April 28, 2025, 19:15 UTC. Official status page confirms ongoing incident.

Kimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7: A Practical Coding Showdown on a Minetest Mod + Google Sheets Integration
A developer tested Kimi K2.6 and Claude Opus 4.7 on building a Minetest bounty board mod with a TypeScript backend and Google Sheets logging. Opus succeeded in both tasks; Kimi passed the local task but failed the integration. Costs: Opus ~$3.59 local, $16.03 integrated; Kimi $0.39 local, $5.03 failed.

Bohrium AI Proteomics Competition 2026 with $13K Prize and Compute Support
Bohrium is running an AI proteomics competition in 2026 with a $13,000 prize pool, internship opportunities, and compute support. The competition was discussed on Hacker News with 17 points and 5 comments.

$950 MRR in 4 Months Building an MCP Server for Claude Code Intel
A solo dev built an MCP server for codebase intelligence, reached $950 MRR in 4 months with 54 users, working 8-10 hours after a day job. No ads, no growth hacking — just Reddit and Medium.