Fix for sub-agents not showing up in OpenClaw v2026.3.13

Issue: Sub-agents invisible in v2026.3.13
In OpenClaw version 2026.3.13, some users report that only the main agent appears in the agent list, while custom sub-agents remain invisible. The issue appears to be with automatic path discovery for custom squad members.
Solution: Force-connect method
After analyzing logs, a community member found a reliable workaround involving two configuration changes.
1. Simplify openclaw.json
The 2026.3 parser can fail when the agent list contains extra keys like "path". Keep the list minimal with only "id" values:
"list": [
{ "id": "main", "tools": { "alsoAllow": ["agents_list"], "deny": ["cron"] } },
{ "id": "librarian" },
{ "id": "matrix" }
]Important: Check trailing commas and brackets. The "list" should end with just ] and then } for the "agents" section.
2. Manual registration via runs.json
If the system doesn't detect your agents, manually register them in your .openclaw/subagents/runs.json (or root runs.json depending on setup). Set their status to "idle" to activate them:
{
"version": 2,
"runs": {
"librarian": {
"id": "librarian",
"path": "C:\\Users\\YOUR_USERNAME\\.openclaw\\subagents\\Librarian_Synapse.md",
"status": "idle"
}
}
}3. Verification
After making these changes, restart your gateway and use the /agents command. Your squad should now appear (e.g., showing "Agents (8)" instead of just 1). You can then delegate tasks using the @agent_name tag.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also

How to Optimize Your OpenClaw Setup with Specific Instructions and Refinements
OpenClaw optimization relies on precise instructions and continuous refinement of agent personalities and cost-effective model utilization.

Multi-Agent Architecture: Avoiding the Single-Agent Pitfall in AI Systems
A Reddit post identifies the common architectural mistake of using a single agent for multiple tasks, which leads to fragile systems requiring constant babysitting. The solution proposed is an orchestrator-specialist model where each agent has a narrow, specific role.

OpenClaw Agent Cost Analysis: From $340 to $112 Monthly with Five Optimizations
A developer tracked 18,000 API calls across four OpenClaw agents for 30 days, finding 70% of tasks didn't need GPT-4.1. By implementing prompt caching, shortening system prompts, batching analytics, switching to cheaper models, and adding max token limits, costs dropped from $340 to $112 monthly.

Components of a Coding Agent: How Tools, Memory, and Context Extend LLMs
Sebastian Raschka breaks down the six building blocks of coding agents like Claude Code and Codex CLI, explaining how agent harnesses combine models with tools, memory, and repository context to make LLMs more effective for software work.