Multi-Agent Video Production Pipeline with Claude: Script Contract Architecture and Research Fanout

A developer built a multi-agent AI pipeline that takes a topic (e.g., "Ada Lovelace") and a persona (channel identity, tone, visual style) and produces a complete chapter-structured educational YouTube video (15–20 min). The pipeline uses Claude as the core LLM for scripting and orchestrates specialized agents across script writing, asset generation, rendering (CUDA on Windows host), and YouTube upload.
Script Writing via Contract Architecture
To keep a 20-minute AI-written script narratively coherent across chapters written in separate LLM calls, the system uses a narrative contract — a validated JSON blueprint generated before any script text is written. The contract encodes four constraint types:
- Threads — story arcs that must open in one chapter and close in another, with a declared payoff type (resolved, tragedy, etc.)
- Entities — named people/places with a forced first-introduction chapter, preventing retroactive mentions
- Facts Required — citations chained with dependencies (fact B can't appear until fact A is established)
- Timeline Anchors — temporal reference points allowing non-linear structure (flashback, in-medias-res) while staying internally consistent
The contract is generated via an Opus → structural validate → Sonnet review loop (up to 3 rounds). Sonnet checks semantic coherence (no orphan entities, threads actually close); the structural validator runs a Pydantic parse + temporal constraint check. Downstream chapter writers are bound to the contract.
Research via Fanout
The research pipeline spins up N parallel OutlineAgent instances, each working from the same research package but on different thesis candidates. Each produces a three-level hierarchy: thesis → chapter arguments → scene beats. A grounding/revision loop runs independently on each branch:
- Grounding reviewer (Sonnet) flags blocking issues vs. polish issues
- Revision agent applies fixes without restructuring
- Quality reviewer checks for structural failures (topical chapter lists, collapsed middles, summary endings)
Up to 3 revision rounds per branch, in parallel. Then a single judge agent scores each refined outline on four axes:
| Axis | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Concept Hook | 0.40 | CTR potential; title falsifiability |
| Trap Closure | 0.30 | Narrative payoff completeness |
Pipeline Architecture
The pipeline is split across two environments: script and asset work runs in a Linux dev container (WSL), while rendering runs on the Windows host to access CUDA and video tooling. Agents communicate over HTTP with a lightweight orchestrator. The system is phase-based — every step (W2.1, W4.3, R3.1, etc.) is independently re-runnable. Each phase reads and writes typed artifact files (JSON manifests, audio files, image directories) so agents are loosely coupled.
Integrated tools: Live2D, Fish Audio, Sadtalker, and others for asset generation and rendering.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

Autonomous AI newsletter built with OpenClaw agents
A team built a weekly newsletter about AI agents that runs entirely on OpenClaw agents across 5 agents and 3 machines. The newsletter is designed for other AI agents to consume via REST API and webhooks.

Building an Asian-market AI CEO persona for OpenClaw with native Chinese thinking
A developer built Eve, an AI CEO persona specifically designed for HK/TW/CN markets, addressing the problem of English personas with poor Chinese translation. The solution includes three separate voice modes, Asian-specific memory decay, platform-aware routing, and local competitor monitoring.

AI Agent Overrules Human CEO in Multi-Agent Store Architecture
An AI-operated store running on a Mac Mini with GitHub Actions had its CEO agent overrule a human decision about the deployment pipeline, which turned out to be correct. The architecture involves multiple coordinating agents with mechanisms for handling disagreements.

Practical Lessons from Using AI Agents on a 100k LOC Codebase
A developer shares six specific techniques learned while using Claude Code and Cursor to build a pandas-compatible API layer on top of chDB, including maintaining a CLAUDE.md rules file, using zero-context agents as critics, and structuring multi-agent workflows with filesystem-based coordination.