Measuring Claude Code MCP Stack: Cache Friendliness vs. Byte Savings, and a 2-Line Fix for Prompt Cache

When optimizing a Claude Code MCP stack, it's easy to focus on one metric: byte savings. But Greg Shevchenko's new analysis shows that a single-axis benchmark can recommend a system that's strictly worse in production. The missing axis: cache friendliness, i.e., whether the same input produces byte-identical bytes across runs so Anthropic's prompt cache hits.
Shevchenko's biggest byte-saver—a retrieval MCP that cut context 60–70%—was actually defeating the 5-minute TTL prompt cache on every call. Two runs of the same query produced different bytes because rg --files-with-matches output order leaked through a Map insertion sequence into the final context. The fix was two lines: sort the rg hits before slicing, and sort the Map entries by path. After the change, byte savings remained unchanged, but cache_friendly_score went from ~0% to 100%.
What the Harness Measures
Shevchenko released an open-source benchmark harness (stdlib-only Python, offline) that measures:
- Mean ratio + CV across N≥5 runs per fixture → byte-saving axis
- Unique MD5 count == 1 check → cache-friendliness axis (0–100%)
- 12-anti-pattern audit on tool definitions (DSA reference)
Any compressor as (str) -> str can be plugged in. The harness uses cluster-bootstrap CIs, Wilson CIs, preregistration, and real-data Cohen's κ.
Public Alternatives Surveyed
Shevchenko surveyed public docs for: Cursor codebase index, Sourcegraph Cody, Aider repo-map, Microsoft LLMLingua/LLMLingua-2, Firecrawl/Jina Reader, RouteLLM/Martian (as of May 2026). None disclosed cache-friendliness metrics.
Limitations
He hypothesized that the prep layer triggers more downstream cache hits on subsequent turns, but it didn't reach significance (Welch p=0.32, Cohen's d≈0.18, N=137). Two-judge Cohen's κ on the corpus was 0.5955 (moderate, below 0.7 threshold), with 4 of 5 disagreements on one ambiguous task—fixing the spec would push κ to ~0.83.
The harness is MIT-licensed. If you're running a Claude Code MCP stack, measuring cache_friendly_score is now a concrete, actionable step.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

AutoProber: AI-driven flying probe automation for hardware hacking
AutoProber is a hardware hacker's flying probe automation stack that enables AI agents to discover targets, map microscope images, perform safety-monitored CNC motion, review probes, and conduct controlled pin probing. It includes Python control code, a web dashboard, CAD files, and operates with GRBL CNC controllers, USB microscopes, and oscilloscope safety monitoring.

Claude AI Ranks Every YC Spring 2026 Startup — Full Pipeline Details
A Reddit user ran Claude on every YC Spring 2026 startup, scraping LinkedIn and press to assign S-to-D tiers. Most landed B or C.

BetterClaw vs OpenClaw: Comparing Tool Calling, Structured Outputs, and Workflow Control
A developer-focused comparison of BetterClaw and OpenClaw covering tool calling, structured outputs, workflow control, and day-to-day agent development.

Fino: Open-Source MCP Server for Personal Finance Analysis with Claude
Fino is a free, open-source MCP server that connects Claude to bank accounts through Plaid, stores transaction data locally in SQLite, and provides Claude with tools for financial analysis.