Illinois Passes SB 315: Third-Party Audits Required for Frontier AI Labs

Illinois lawmakers just passed SB 315, a bill that requires frontier AI labs—OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind—to have their safety practices audited by a third party. Governor Pritzker plans to sign it. This would make Illinois the state with the strongest AI safety law in the US, going beyond California and New York.
How it works
SB 315 mandates that AI labs hire independent auditors to verify adherence to the lab's own safety commitments. Previously, no independent body was required—Scott Wisor of Secure AI Project describes it as "companies grading their own homework." The auditors can be from the Big Four (Deloitte, EY, KPMG, PwC) or members of the AI Evaluator Forum (METR, Transluce, Averi). The bill does not prescribe specific safety standards; rather, it enforces accountability for whatever commitments the lab publicly makes.
Industry response
OpenAI's chief of global affairs Chris Lehane called it a "thoughtful framework" and noted the company's AI policy now focuses on passing similar state laws. Anthropic claims it was the first lab to support SB 315, thanking lawmakers for setting a "baseline that every leading AI developer is expected to meet." However, trade group Chamber of Progress (backed by Google, Apple, Amazon, a16z) opposes the bill, arguing it "would force companies to expose sensitive systems to untested auditors in a regulatory regime that’s all liability and no standards."
Broader context
With no federal AI safety law in place, states are stepping up. California and NY currently require reporting on guardrails and safety incidents, but Illinois adds the independent audit requirement. Notably, OpenAI previously supported a different Illinois bill that included a liability shield for catastrophic harm—Lehane later called that support an "oversight" and the company now backs SB 315 instead.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Anthropic Responds to Code Leak Involving Claude AI Agent
Anthropic is working to contain a leak of code related to its Claude AI agent, according to a WSJ report discussed on Hacker News with 13 points and 6 comments.

Grammar-Based Method Matches or Outperforms AI in Authorship Analysis
A University of Manchester study found that LambdaG, a grammar-based authorship analysis method, matched or exceeded leading AI systems across most test datasets while offering greater transparency and lower computational cost.

Choosing the Best Token Provider for Your API Needs
Explore the key factors to consider when selecting a provider for tokens and APIs in AI coding and automation, based on insights from the OpenClaw community.

Developer's experience with Claude AI: From thinking partner to cognitive outsourcing
A developer shares an 8-month experience using Claude AI daily, noting a shift from using it to refine existing thinking to outsourcing initial thinking entirely. The post describes two distinct cognitive approaches: AI as a thinking partner versus AI as a first-pass generator.