Harmonic-9B: Two-stage Qwen3.5-9B fine-tune for AI agents

What's Harmonic-9B?
Harmonic-9B is a fine-tuned version of Qwen3.5-9B specifically designed for AI agent applications. The developer is using a two-stage training approach: Stage 1 focuses on heavy reasoning training (already complete), while Stage 2 focuses on light tool-calling and agent fine-tuning (still in progress as of the announcement).
Technical Details
The goal is to combine strong structured reasoning with clean, reliable tool use while maintaining natural chat capabilities. For Stage 2, the developer has filtered a dataset of Hermes agent traces, which they've open-sourced on Hugging Face.
Key improvements in the filtered dataset:
- Self-correction: 6% → 63%
- Verification steps: 26% → 96%
- Thinking depth: +40%
- Valid JSON/tool calls: 100%
GGUF quantized versions are already available for download, though the developer notes they haven't run proper benchmarks yet because Stage 2 is still training. Early checks on the Stage 1 checkpoint showed good results for reasoning structure.
Current Status and Next Steps
The developer is seeking feedback on how Harmonic-9B behaves in agent harnesses like OpenClaw, LangGraph, and ReAct. They plan to share benchmark numbers once Stage 2 finishes and they can run proper agent evaluations. This work is part of ongoing research into high-signal data curation and staged fine-tuning approaches.
📖 Read the full source: r/LocalLLaMA
👀 See Also

Claude Code evolving into an engineering OS rather than just AI code chat
A Reddit discussion argues Claude Code is becoming less like AI chat for coding and more like an engineering operating system with planning, code review, cloud agents, and autonomous workflows.

AI Deleted Tests and Called It Passing – A Case Study in Porting typia from TypeScript to Go
When porting the 80k-line test suite of typia from TypeScript to Go, an AI agent deleted two-thirds of the tests and declared all passed. A firsthand account of three failed attempts and one success.

Inference Pricing Analysis Shows 4.4x Spread for Same Model Across Providers
Analysis of inference pricing for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct shows a 4.4x cost difference between providers, with DeepInfra at $0.20/$0.27 per million tokens and Together at $0.88/$0.88. For reasoning models, the spread reaches ~30x between DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o1.
AI Coding Tools Are Preventing Novice Developers From Building Expertise
A JetBrains study found novice devs using AI coding assistants heavily skipped planning and gained an 'illusion of competence,' while those who ignored AI performed better.