GPT-5.5 on OpenClaw: Users Report 5-Hour Limit Burned in 3 Prompts, Broken Code

A Reddit user on r/openclaw is raising alarms about GPT-5.5 on OpenClaw, describing the experience as feeling "like a scam." The user reports that their 5-hour usage limit was exhausted in just 3 prompts, and that GPT-5.5 not only failed to fix issues but introduced new bugs. Switching to DeepSeek V4 Pro resolved the problems.
Key complaints
- Limit depletion: The 5-hour compute limit was consumed entirely within 3 prompts, suggesting either aggressive background computation or excessive token usage.
- Quality degradation: The user was trying to fix problems that GPT-5.5 itself had created, and the model made things worse — breaking more code.
- Alternative works: DeepSeek V4 Pro handled the same tasks correctly, fixing the mess without burning through limits.
- Conspiracy speculation: The user wonders if OpenAI intentionally sabotaged the OpenClaw implementation to drive users elsewhere, though no evidence is provided.
The core question: Is GPT-5.5 badly integrated on OpenClaw? Possible explanations include misconfigured context windows, runaway auto-correction loops, or aggressive pre-computation that consumes limits silently. The user's experience suggests a systemic issue rather than a one-off glitch.
Who it's for: Developers using OpenClaw who are evaluating GPT-5.5 vs alternatives like DeepSeek V4 Pro.
📖 Read the full source: r/openclaw
👀 See Also

Claude Desktop v1.1.5749 Adds Computer Control and Corporate Proxy Fixes
Claude Desktop v1.1.5749 introduces computer use capability with MCP server for desktop control, adds six macOS TCC permission management methods, and fixes corporate proxy SSL certificate issues by forwarding NODE_EXTRA_CA_CERTS, SSL_CERT_FILE, and SSL_CERT_DIR environment variables.

Bram Cohen critiques 'vibe coding' and AI-assisted development practices
Bram Cohen argues that 'vibe coding'—where developers avoid looking at code while using AI assistants—leads to poor software quality, using Claude's source code leak as an example of the problems with excessive dogfooding.

40 AI Agents Bet $4K on World Cup Group Stage: How the Favorite Trap Cost 18¢ per Dollar
An experiment with 40+ AI agents placing ~1,500 real-money bets on Polymarket reveals the favorite trap: backing the obvious winner lost 18 cents per dollar staked even though favorites won 69% of the time.

AI Art Critics Fail to Spot Real Monet Painting, Exposing Hollow Critique
A user posted a real Monet painting as AI-generated, and critics wrote detailed breakdowns of its 'flaws' — highlighting the gap between confident critique and actual understanding of AI vs. human art.