Email Automation with OpenClaw: Triage, Summarize, Draft

Email Automation with OpenClaw: Triage, Summarize, Draft
Email triage is one of the most demanded OpenClaw use cases. The agent can sort emails, filter spam and marketing, summarize important messages, and create draft responses.
What the Agent Can Do
- Sort — important vs unimportant
- Filter — remove marketing, notifications
- Summarize — brief content summary
- Draft — suggest responses
- Prioritize — what needs attention
Technical Setup
Email API:
- Nylas (free, multi-platform)
- Gmail API
- Microsoft Graph API
Nylas Setup:
- Register at nylas.com
- Get API key
- Connect accounts (Gmail, Outlook, etc.)
- Configure skill in OpenClaw
Example Workflow
Every hour:
1. Get new emails from all accounts
2. Classify:
- Important: needs response
- FYI: read, don't respond
- Marketing: ignore
- Automated: system notifications
3. For Important:
- Summarize
- Create draft response
4. Send report to user
Security Critical
Important: Input validation
Agent should NOT send emails without confirmation!
Correct setup:
- Read access — yes
- Draft creation — yes
- Send — ONLY after approval
Prompt:
Never send emails directly. Always create drafts
and ask for my approval before sending anything.
Email Classification
| Category | Action |
|---|---|
| Client emails | Summary + draft response |
| Team emails | Summary only |
| Marketing | Delete / archive |
| Newsletters | Separate folder |
| Invoices | Mark for accounting |
| Spam | Auto-delete |
Results
- Save 1-2 hours daily
- No missed important emails
- Fast responses (drafts ready)
- Clean inbox
Read less, respond faster.
👀 See Also

Operational Memory Over Automation: Why Small Business Agents Need to Remember
The real value for small business AI agents isn't automation — it's operational memory. A white paper from McPhersonAI argues agents should behave like disciplined operators: remember standards, notice drift, preserve context, and surface what matters.

Using Claude, Gemini, and GPT for AI-Assisted Coding Tasks
Discover how combining Claude, Gemini, and GPT can enhance AI coding workflows by leveraging their unique access capabilities for specific tasks.

Building a 13-Agent Claude Team with Peer Review Workflow
A developer built a 13-agent Claude system where AI agents review each other's work, run on scheduled heartbeats, and track everything in a database for marketing automation.

Case Study: Using LLM Prompts Instead of Programmatic Scaffolding for Multi-Agent Software Builds
A case study of 10 autonomous software builds using a Claude Opus orchestrator with CLI access and Codex worker agents produced 10 TypeScript browser games totaling over 50,000 lines of code with zero human code intervention. The orchestration logic was entirely prompt-based, replacing a purpose-built scaffold.