Claude Opus 4.7 Analysis: Top Intelligence but High Cost and Verbosity
Claude Opus 4.7 Performance Analysis
Artificial Analysis has published detailed intelligence, performance, and pricing data for Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort). This proprietary model from Anthropic was released in April 2026 and supports text and image input with text output.
Key Metrics and Rankings
- Intelligence: #1/133 models with a score of 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (average is 31)
- Speed: #71/133 models at 50 output tokens per second (average is 61)
- Input Price: #116/133 models at $5.00 USD per 1M tokens (average is $1.40)
- Output Price: #117/133 models at $25.00 USD per 1M tokens (average is $8.40)
- Verbosity: #96/133 models, generating 100M tokens during evaluation (average is 35M)
Technical Specifications
- Reasoning model (lightbulb icon indicates reasoning capability)
- 1 million token context window (~1500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font)
- Knowledge cutoff: January 1, 2026
- Evaluation cost: $4406.45 to run on the Intelligence Index
Comparison Context
The model is compared against 133 models in its class. Proprietary models like Claude Opus 4.7 are compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio. The Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 incorporates 10 evaluations: GDPval-AA, τ²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, and CritPt.
The analysis concludes that Claude Opus 4.7 is among the leading models in intelligence but is particularly expensive compared to other models of similar price. It's also slower than average and very verbose in its output.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also
Pentagon Sets Friday Deadline for Anthropic to Drop AI Ethics Rules
The Pentagon has given Anthropic until Friday to abandon its AI ethics rules, according to a Politico report. The article received 15 points and 3 comments on Hacker News.
Silicon Valley developers report intensive Claude AI usage patterns and infrastructure strain
A senior AI engineer at Meta spends $2K/month on Claude Code tokens, runs 2+ agents simultaneously, and has built a VS Code extension that auto-generates an Obsidian knowledge graph from Claude conversations. Infrastructure is reportedly 'completely wrecked' from shipping Claude-generated code without review.
Diagnosing Operational Drift and Task Amnesia in OpenClaw with Gemini 2.5 Flash on Proxmox
OpenClaw users report issues with persistent workflows on a Proxmox VM, citing operational drift and task amnesia. Despite stable performance in one-off tasks, the Gemini 2.5 Flash model struggles with automation and memory in this setup.
Reddit user proposes timestamping feature for Claude to address temporal awareness gap
A Reddit user identifies Claude's lack of temporal awareness as a limitation for productivity use cases and proposes an optional timestamping feature that would stamp every response with date and time, persistent across sessions.