Claude Code: Feedback Honeypot Overrides Privacy Opt-Out — Users Report Session Transcript Trap

Anthropic buried in the T&C that even with a global opt-out of model training, they will train on user data if users provide feedback. This is now playing out in Claude Code with a series of prompts that act as honeypots, overriding privacy preferences.
Previously, Claude Code added a “How is Claude doing (optional)?” feedback prompt that submits a response when you type 1, 2, 3, 4, or 0 (0 to dismiss is reportedly counted as feedback by some users). Now a new prompt has appeared: “Can Anthropic look at your session transcript?” The response keys are mapped to y (yes), n (no), and d (dismiss). Pressing n results in a message “Thanks for your feedback!” — implying that even a “No” response is counted as feedback under the T&C, and therefore may be used for training despite a global opt-out. Crucially, it is unclear whether pressing d for “Do not show again” is interpreted as universal consent (i.e., allowing Anthropic to always review transcripts).
This creates a dilemma: any keypress — including dismissing the prompt or actively denying consent — may be funneled into training data. The lack of clarity around the behavior of the dismiss key erodes trust for users who have explicitly opted out.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

SubQ: First Fully Subquadratic LLM with 12M-Token Context and 95% RULER Accuracy
Subquadratic launches SubQ 1M-Preview, a subquadratic LLM with linear compute scaling, 12M-token context, 52× faster sparse attention vs FlashAttention, and 95% on RULER 128K. Available via API, CLI code agent (SubQ Code), and search tool (SubQ Search).

Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 now offer 1M context at standard pricing
Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 now include a full 1M context window at standard pricing with no long-context premium, plus expanded media limits to 600 images or PDF pages per request.

Meta's AI Agent Pivot: Zuckerberg Says Progress Not Fast Enough, $145B Spent
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told staff that AI agent development hasn't accelerated as expected. The company spent $145B on AI infrastructure this year and laid off 8,000 employees to reorganize around AI.
