Claude Code: Feedback Honeypot Overrides Privacy Opt-Out — Users Report Session Transcript Trap

Anthropic buried in the T&C that even with a global opt-out of model training, they will train on user data if users provide feedback. This is now playing out in Claude Code with a series of prompts that act as honeypots, overriding privacy preferences.
Previously, Claude Code added a “How is Claude doing (optional)?” feedback prompt that submits a response when you type 1, 2, 3, 4, or 0 (0 to dismiss is reportedly counted as feedback by some users). Now a new prompt has appeared: “Can Anthropic look at your session transcript?” The response keys are mapped to y (yes), n (no), and d (dismiss). Pressing n results in a message “Thanks for your feedback!” — implying that even a “No” response is counted as feedback under the T&C, and therefore may be used for training despite a global opt-out. Crucially, it is unclear whether pressing d for “Do not show again” is interpreted as universal consent (i.e., allowing Anthropic to always review transcripts).
This creates a dilemma: any keypress — including dismissing the prompt or actively denying consent — may be funneled into training data. The lack of clarity around the behavior of the dismiss key erodes trust for users who have explicitly opted out.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

AI Fails to Boost Productivity According to Recent CEO Study
Despite widespread AI adoption, a study of 6,000 executives reports negligible impacts on productivity and employment, echoing the productivity paradox identified in the IT era of the 1980s.

Claude Code v2.1.170: Claude Fable 5 Model Access and VS Code Session Fix
Claude Code v2.1.170 adds Claude Fable 5, a Mythos-class model with unprecedented capabilities, and fixes session transcript saving in VS Code integrated terminal.

Vibe Coding vs. Production Reality: The Undiscussed Liabilities
Reddit user External_Bobcat8183 highlights the gap between fast PoCs with vibe coding and real production issues: auth, secrets, GDPR, rate limiting, multi-tenancy.

OpenAI secretly funded age verification advocacy group in California
OpenAI secretly funded the Parents and Kids Safe AI Coalition, a California group pushing for age verification requirements in AI, while hiding its involvement from other advocacy organizations. The company pledged $10 million to support the Parents and Kids Safe AI Act legislation.