Benchmarking the Latest AI Models: The Rise of Extreme Models
The recent benchmarking of 40 new AI models brings to light significant shifts in the Price vs. Performance landscape. With attention focused on Kimi k2.5 and Claude Opus 4.6, the analysis reveals a divide into two extremes: 'God Mode' and 'Flash Mode', rendering mid-range models ineffective.
Key Details
- Kimi k2.5 Situation: Attempts to benchmark Kimi k2.5 were unsuccessful due to persistent 'No Content' errors, likely due to overload. However, Kimi-k2-Thinking performed adequately for complex reasoning tasks at ~15 TPS.
- Speed Dominance: For latency-sensitive applications, Liquid LFM 2.5 emerged as the speediest model clocking in at ~359 tokens/sec, followed by Ministral 3B at ~293 tokens/sec.
- Cost Efficiency: Ministral 3B stands out as the most cost-effective solution, at $0.10/1M input tokens. It is ~17x cheaper and ~40% faster than GPT-5.2 Codex, making it a strong value play against higher-priced options.
The recommendation is to avoid mid-range models that cost between $0.50 - $1.00, as they do not offer competitive performance. Depending on your needs, choose higher-priced models like Opus/GPT-5 for intelligence or opt for cost-effective speed with Liquid/Mistral.
📖 Read the full source: r/LocalLLaMA
👀 See Also
Trump Pulls Back AI Executive Order Over Fears of Slowing US Tech
President Trump rescinded a Biden-era AI executive order, arguing it could hinder US technological leadership. The move eliminates federal safety reporting mandates.
Benchmark shows smaller 4B model outperforms larger LLMs for phone-to-home chat applications
A benchmark of 8 local LLMs for phone-to-home chat applications found Gemma3:4B won with a composite fitness score of 88.7 despite being the smallest model, outperforming larger models up to 24B parameters due to faster response times and lower thermal load.
OpenClaw users report high API costs from vague prompts, developer advises structured workflows
A Reddit user reports a $300 Anthropic bill from OpenClaw due to vague prompting, with the community noting the orchestrator works best with clear intentions and structured workflows rather than acting as a 'genie' for wishful thinking.
M5 Max vs M3 Max Inference Benchmarks for Qwen Models on oMLX
Benchmarks comparing M5 Max and M3 Max MacBook Pros running Qwen 3.5 models via oMLX v0.2.23 show M5 Max delivering 1.4-1.7x faster token generation and up to 4x faster prefill at long contexts.