AIME 2026 Results: Both Open and Closed Models Score Above 90%

The AIME 2026 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) results are out, and both closed and open AI models are now scoring above 90% on this challenging mathematical reasoning benchmark.
Key Highlights
- Both proprietary (closed) and open-source models exceed 90% accuracy
- DeepSeek V3.2 can run the entire test for approximately bash.09 in API costs
- This represents a significant milestone in mathematical reasoning capabilities
What This Means
AIME is traditionally one of the most challenging high school mathematics competitions, featuring problems that require sophisticated mathematical reasoning. AI models achieving 90%+ accuracy demonstrates remarkable progress in complex reasoning abilities.
Cost Efficiency
The fact that DeepSeek V3.2 can achieve competitive results at just bash.09 for the entire test highlights the rapidly decreasing cost of advanced AI capabilities, making sophisticated reasoning more accessible.
Why This Matters
The achievement of over 90% accuracy by both closed and open AI models signifies a pivotal moment in the evolution of AI technologies. It showcases the potential for AI to assist not only in educational contexts but also in real-world applications where complex problem-solving is required. This advancement may encourage further investment and development in AI systems, particularly in areas that require high-level cognitive functions.
Key Takeaways
- The performance of AI models in AIME 2026 indicates a leap in their mathematical reasoning capabilities.
- Both proprietary and open-source models are reaching similar levels of accuracy, promoting healthy competition and innovation in the AI space.
- Cost-effective solutions like DeepSeek V3.2 are making advanced AI tools more accessible to a broader audience.
- This progress could inspire educational institutions to integrate AI tools into their curricula, enhancing learning experiences.
Getting Started
For those interested in leveraging AI for mathematical reasoning or other complex tasks, starting with tools like DeepSeek V3.2 is straightforward. Users can sign up for an API key on the DeepSeek website, enabling them to access the model's capabilities. Once registered, developers can integrate the API into their applications or use it for personal projects, allowing for experimentation with AI-driven problem-solving.
Full results: matharena.ai
📖 Read the full source: r/LocalLLaMA
👀 See Also

Pre-Configured OpenClaw Agents: Setup Business vs. Platform Threat
A practitioner report after 10+ clients reveals pre-configured OpenClaw agent business is about install-plus-ongoing-management, not selling digital employees. Setup is a one-time fee; the platform will eventually eat it.

Benchmark Comparison of Qwen 3.5 Models Against Major AI Models
A benchmark comparison website includes verified scores and head-to-head infographics for Qwen 3.5 models (122B, 35B, 27B, 397B) against models like GPT-5.2, Claude 4.5 Opus, Gemini-3 Pro, and others.

Longitudinal study finds AI productivity gains at 10%, not 10x
A longitudinal study tracking 40 companies from November 2024 through February 2026 found AI usage increased by 65% on average, but pull request throughput only increased by 9.97%. The data suggests coding was never the primary bottleneck in software development.

Qwen3.6 27B FP8 Runs 200k Tokens BF16 KV Cache at 80 TPS on RTX 5000 PRO 48GB
A Reddit user shares a vLLM setup for Qwen3.6 27B FP8 with BF16 KV cache at 200k tokens, achieving 60-90 TPS on a single RTX 5000 PRO 48GB. Full environment variables, config, and benchmark results are provided.