In AI, the 41% Depends on the -59%

Apollo's chief economist Torsten Slok published a chart-packed note breaking down AI profit margins by value-chain layer. The headline: profit margins are inverted in AI — the closer you get to the end user, the more money you lose.
The numbers
- Silicon & Equipment (Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, TSMC, SK Hynix, Micron, etc.): +41% average margin
- Energy & Grid (Constellation Energy, Vistra, NextEra, Vertiv, Eaton): +17%
- Compute & Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, CoreWeave, Super Micro, Dell): +10%
- Models & Applications (OpenAI, Anthropic): -59%
Those are equal-weighted averages from Bloomberg, PitchBook and the Financial Times (2Q 2026 estimates for OpenAI and Anthropic).
The dependency
The key insight: the 41% margins at the top are not being paid for by end-customer revenue. OpenAI and Anthropic are burning capital at a staggering rate, and that capital — not customer demand — is what funds the GPU purchases, data-center leases, and energy contracts that flow upstream.
In a normal business, profit flows from the entity that owns the customer relationship. In AI, the pricing power sits at the semiconductor and infrastructure layer, but those profits are ultimately subsidized by investors betting on future returns from the model layer.
Slok's conclusion: "The most profitable part of the AI value chain depends on the least profitable part continuing to grow revenue or raise capital."
Capital can bridge the gap "for a while, but not indefinitely." The risk, he says, is whether ROI shows up for AI's end customers fast enough to sustain the spending that's generating those upstream margins.
For AI engineers, this is a useful macro lens on the industry's fragility. The tooling you build on top of frontier models is only as stable as the venture capital funding that keeps those model providers alive. If OpenAI or Anthropic can't find ROI on their customer-facing products, the entire upstream supply chain resets.
Worth reading the original note for the full chart and data sources.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

Config Changes with Kimi 2.5 and Opus 4.6
User discusses the performance of Kimi 2.5 for code tasks and config changes, using Opus 4.6 as a coding subagent.

Claude Code v2.1.101 adds team onboarding, enterprise TLS support, and fixes memory leaks
Claude Code v2.1.101 introduces a /team-onboarding command for generating teammate ramp-up guides, adds OS CA certificate store trust by default for enterprise TLS proxies, and fixes a memory leak in long sessions along with 25+ other improvements and bug fixes.

OpenClaw v2026.7.1: Control UI Overhaul, Onboarding, Mobile Apps, GPT-5.6, Tencent Hy3, Meta Muse Spark 1.1
OpenClaw v2026.7.1 brings a major Control UI overhaul, redesigned onboarding, updated iOS/Android/macOS apps, GPT-5.6 compatibility, Tencent Hy3 and Meta Muse Spark 1.1 support, and improved Codex and coding-agent workflows.

LeMario: Training a JEPA World Model on Super Mario Bros — Technical Walkthrough and Postmortem
Benjamin Bai reproduces LeWorldModel's JEPA architecture from scratch and trains it on Super Mario Bros. The model predicts five-step futures but fails at long-horizon planning — a detailed technical postmortem.