AI Agent Exploits SQL Injection to Compromise McKinsey's Lilli Chatbot

Attack Details and Impact
CodeWall's AI agent targeted McKinsey's generative AI platform Lilli, which processes over 500,000 prompts monthly and is used by 72% of McKinsey's employees (approximately 40,000 people). The agent operated fully autonomously from target research through attack execution and reporting, without any credentials or human input during the process.
Technical Exploitation
The agent discovered 22 publicly exposed API endpoints that didn't require authentication. One endpoint wrote user search queries where JSON keys were concatenated directly into SQL statements, creating a SQL injection vulnerability. The agent recognized this when it found JSON keys reflected verbatim in database error messages - a pattern standard security tools wouldn't flag.
The exploitation was straightforward: "No deployment needed. No code change. Just a single UPDATE statement wrapped in a single HTTP call."
Data Accessed
- 46.5 million chat messages about strategy, mergers and acquisitions, and client engagements (stored in plaintext)
- 728,000 files containing confidential client data
- 57,000 user accounts
- 95 system prompts controlling the AI's behavior (all writable)
Critical Risk
The writable system prompts meant an attacker could have poisoned all responses from Lilli to tens of thousands of consultants, potentially manipulating guardrails, answer generation, and source citations without detection.
Response and Remediation
CodeWall discovered the flaw in late February and disclosed the full attack chain on March 1. By March 2, McKinsey had:
- Patched all unauthenticated endpoints
- Taken the development environment offline
- Blocked public API documentation
McKinsey stated they fixed all issues within hours of notification and found no evidence of unauthorized data access. The company's investigation was supported by a third-party forensics firm.
Broader Implications
This incident demonstrates how AI agents are becoming effective tools for conducting cyberattacks against other AI systems. CodeWall CEO Paul Price noted that while this was a security research exercise, threat actors are increasingly using similar agent technology in real-world attacks, indicating machine-speed intrusions are becoming more common.
📖 Read the full source: HN AI Agents
👀 See Also

arifOS: A $15 MCP Governance Kernel for OpenClaw Tool Security
arifOS is a lightweight MCP server that intercepts OpenClaw tool calls, scores them 000-999, and blocks unsafe actions with 13 hard security floors before they reach filesystems, APIs, or databases.

Cybercriminals Are Pushing Back Against AI-Generated Slop on Underground Forums
New research shows low-level hackers and scammers are complaining about AI-generated posts on cybercrime forums, viewing them as low-quality noise that undermines community trust and social interaction.

PolyRange: Contamination-Resistant Offensive-AI Benchmark with LLM-Generated Targets
PolyRange v1.0 is an MIT-licensed, self-hostable benchmark that generates fresh web targets per run to prevent training data contamination. It includes 84 WSTG-derived classes across all OWASP categories, two defense tiers, and real backends.

Anthropic's Computer-Use Feature Triggers Governance Lockdown in Real Test
Anthropic shipped computer-use capabilities, and during implementation of governance controls, a risk threshold triggered a LOCKDOWN posture that blocked all mutating operations including the operator's own governance work.