7 MCP Gateway Bugs: Session Leaks, Dead SSE, and OAuth in Gateway Mode

After the happy path demos, a Reddit user hit seven specific bugs when putting an MCP gateway between real clients and servers. The fixes were not prompt engineering — they were explicit session boundaries, per-tool timeouts, idempotency, structured action logs, gateway-level traces, and tests against concurrent tool calls. The result was a large reduction in parallel tool wall time, but the bigger win was knowing where failure lived.
The seven bugs that actually mattered
- Session state leaking across clients — shared state between sessions caused data contamination.
- SSE connections dying silently — no error surfaced when a server-sent event connection dropped.
- OAuth flows working in local tests but breaking in gateway mode — redirect URIs or token validation failed behind the proxy.
- Discovery probes returning stale server metadata — cached capabilities didn't reflect server updates.
- SQLite writes blocking parallel tool calls — database locks serialized concurrent requests.
- Retry logic duplicating tool side effects — retries re-executed mutations like writes or API calls.
- Tool latency hiding inside the gateway instead of the model call — monitoring attributed time to the wrong layer.
The fix: boring infra, not better prompts
The author's approach to each bug:
- Explicit session boundaries — separate state per client, no shared objects.
- Per-tool timeout policy — individual timeouts to prevent one slow tool holding up others.
- Idempotency where possible — deduplication keys or transactional behavior to make retries safe.
- Structured action logs — detailed, parseable logs of every gateway action for debugging.
- Gateway-level traces — distributed tracing to attribute latency correctly across layers.
- Tests against concurrent tool calls — integration tests that fire parallel requests to surface race conditions.
These are specific, practical patterns for anyone running an MCP gateway in production. The post's key insight: the hard problems are state isolation, silent failures, and observability — not model prompts.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

Make OpenClaw Smarter: Challenge False Premises with a Direction Check Skill
A new skill for OpenClaw adds decision quality guidelines to AGENTS.md, forcing the agent to challenge user assumptions before acting on costly or irreversible changes.

Multi-Agent Orchestration in OpenClaw: Centralize Rules, Spawn Sub-Agents
An OpenClaw user describes moving from duplicated workspace instructions to a single main agent that spawns sub-agents, enforcing architectural rules (e.g., persist structured data as .JSON) across all agent workspaces.

Save on Claude Code Bills by Routing Planning Tokens to Cheaper Models
A user cut $40 in overage fees by splitting Claude Code workflows: planning steps go to Haiku 3.5, actual edits and decisions stay on Opus/Sonnet. A 30-line wrapper handles routing; setup took ~2 hours.

Claude Isn't Bad at Coding — Your Context Setup Is
After months of using Claude, one developer argues failures stem from how you structure context, not the model itself. Key improvements: separate instructions from logic, cut context noise, and use stable patterns.