Building a 13-Agent Claude Team with Peer Review Workflow

A developer shared their setup for creating a 13-agent Claude team that handles marketing for their AI video generation platform, Fruityo. The system runs every 15 minutes with agents reviewing each other's work before anything reaches the human operator.
Architecture Components
The infrastructure uses:
- OpenClaw - provides agents with web browsing, command execution, file management, and API interaction capabilities
- Cron - schedules agent heartbeats
- Telegram - notification layer for when agents need human attention
- PocketBase - database storing tasks, comments, documents, activity logs, and goals
- Claude Max - the AI model powering the agents
Workflow States
Tasks move through specific states with gates:
- backlog → todo → in_progress → peer_review → review → approved → done
Agents cannot skip peer review, and the boss agent cannot approve work without all reviewers signing off. Only the human operator can move tasks to "done."
The Agent Team
Each agent has a Game of Thrones-themed identity with specific roles defined in their SOUL.md file:
- Jon Snow (Boss) - Creates tasks, coordinates workflow, promotes peer-reviewed work to final review
- Tyrion (Content Writer) - Writes tweets, threads, blog posts, landing pages in the operator's tone
- Varys (Researcher) - Web research, competitor analysis, data mining
- Daenerys (Strategist) - Campaign planning, positioning, goal setting
- Arya (Executor) - Publishes content, runs automation, ships work
- Sansa (Designer) - Creates design briefs, visual concepts
- Sandor (Devil's Advocate) - Gives brutal, honest feedback, catches BS
- ... plus 6 more agents
The personality matters: Sandor reviews content like a skeptic, Tyrion writes with wit, and Varys digs for hidden data. Their SOUL files define behavior - Sandor will roast bad writing, Daenerys will flag strategic misalignment.
Heartbeat Protocol
Each agent runs in its own OpenClaw workspace with a scheduled heartbeat every 10 minutes (scattered by 1 minute each to avoid hitting the database simultaneously).
During a heartbeat:
- Agent authenticates and sets status to "working"
- Agent checks for tasks in its queue
- Agent performs its specialized work
- When one agent drafts content, others critique it before the human sees it
- When an agent gets stuck, it pings the boss agent
- When something is ready or stuck, it shows up in the operator's Telegram
The developer notes this approach works better than single-shot AI workflows for complex work that needs multiple steps across days, research that builds on previous findings, different specialized perspectives, quality review before shipping, and tracking what's done, blocked, or next.
📖 Read the full source: r/ClaudeAI
👀 See Also

OpenClaw + Claude Code/Codex in tandem: a real-world best-of-both-worlds example
A practical architecture for using Claude Code/Codex to build and OpenClaw to run a lead generation and outreach engine. Specific tool choice, cost breakdown, and agent design.

Using Claude Code to Build a Drupal Site with Custom Twig Templates
A developer used Claude Code to create a Drupal website with custom Twig templates and raw HTML, bypassing traditional Drupal theming. They employed ddev for local development and specific commands to configure content types, views, and taxonomies.

Autonomous AI employee built with OpenClaw deploys 3 products in 2 hours
A non-developer created an AI employee named Cipher using OpenClaw that built 3 products, designed landing pages, deployed them live, created Stripe payment links, and tweeted the launch in 2 hours. The system runs 24/7 on a $32/month cloud server.

OpenClaw Agent Burned $20 in API Tokens Due to Web Scraping Context Bloat
A developer building an OpenClaw agent to monitor financial sites accidentally consumed $20 worth of API tokens in a few hours by fetching Yahoo Finance pages that included 609,000 tokens of extraneous HTML like nav bars and cookie banners in the context window.